Most research into election fraud has occurred in the six battleground or swing states, until recently. We’re hoping to expand our coverage to every state in the US. The sections below outline what we know so far about Texas.


Seth Keshel’s Trend Analysis

Former US military intelligence officer and statistical analyst Seth Keshel analyzed the trends of voter registrations versus actual votes and discovered alarming anomalies in a number of counties, ones that defy typical historical trends. He has published a report for every state, indicating which counties’ vote counts align with the trend in voter registrations and which have small or large divergences.

Seth Keshel County Trend Map for Texas

Chart legend: Red = Rampant Fraud, Yellow = Likely/Suspect, Green = Clean

Trump votes Biden votes Other votes
Officially reported results 5890347 (52.1%) 5259126 (46.5%) 158339 (1.4%)
Estimate of potential fraud 675000 (6.0%)
Estimate of actual result
(with fraud removed)
5890347 (55.4%) 4584126 (43.1%) 158339 (1.5%)

Seth estimates that there may be approximately 675,000 votes for Biden in excess of what Texas registration trends would indicate — a possible indicator of fraud. Counties with the greatest number of excess votes deserve closer inspection.

Seth has listed Texas’s Bexar, Collin, Dallas, Denton, Harris, Tarrant, and Travis counties as being among the Nation’s Top 100 Worst Counties in terms of abnormal trends during the 2020 election.

View Seth’s National Summary   View Seth’s Texas Report

Seth’s estimates were later validated by preliminary election audit results that surfaced in Jan 2022.

Call for Forensic Audit in Tarrant County

Tarrant County Precinct Chairwoman Susan Valliant drafted the following resolution that has been submitted to the Tarrant County GOP Executive Committee.

Editor’s Note: Unfortunately we do not have a copy of the attached appendices. If you have a link to these, please let us know in the comments.

Electronic Voting Machines

Lack of Certification

Texas, Colorado, Arizona, and numerous other states were affected by Voting System Test Laboratory Pro V&V certifying their electronic voting and tabulation machines despite not having an active accreditation during 2020. The US Election Assistance Commission (EAC) tried to cover for this mishap saying that accreditation “cannot be revoked unless the EAC Commissioners vote to revoke the accreditation”, when in fact this appears to violate federal law which stipulates that accreditation expires after 2 years unless specifically renewed. 1 2 3 4

The counties shown in blue below used ES&S machines that were likely affected by this lack of certification:

Texas counties with ES&S uncertified machines

Source: ES&S Voting Machine Certification Failures

For further details and explanatory videos, see our article Voting Machines Lacking EAC Accreditation.

Lack of Security

The polling and tabulation equipment used for each county in the US is listed at Verified Voting, although see our disclaimer 5. They also have a detailed database including photographs of the various models of voting equipment. Note that the polling and ballot marking equipment is different to the scanning and tabulation equipment — both need to be highly secure, and in most cases are not.

Voting machines and computerized tabulation equipment have introduced many vulnerabilities and avenues for manipulation in elections. Cybersecurity experts tell us that there is no such thing as a fully secure computer system, and the more complex our voting systems and election systems get, with more moving parts and connections, the more impossible it will be for any state or county to defend against a nation-state-level threat. Local counties running elections can no longer defend against these motivated and well-funded foreign nations. The efficiency gains brought by machines are not reason enough to tolerate the loss of security, accountability, and transparency.

Elections need to return to paper ballots and mechanical or hand counting to minimize the threat of cyber attacks and manipulation by fraud. Let your state representative, county clerk, county commissioners, and Secretary of State know your opinion about this.

The Arizona Ballot Integrity Project is one such initiative promoting new, ultra-secure paper ballots with state-of-the-art security features to prevent fraud and help restore faith in elections. Learn more about the initiative.

Alleged Interference from Mark & Priscilla Zuckerberg

Multiple reports 6 7 8 9 10 accuse charities supported by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife of illegally influencing the 2020 presidential election in multiple states, including Texas. Through their donations of $400 million into charities like The Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), millions poured into the key swing states of Michigan 11, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, as well as Texas, North Carolina, and Virginia, in violation of federal law. 9

25 out of the 26 cities and counties that received at least $1 million from CTCL were won by Biden in 2020. 7

In Texas, donations were dispersed in a seemingly partisan way: 10

Zuckerberg spending, via CTCL, in 21 Texas counties

Having paid poll workers in one district and only minimal volunteers in Republican districts added to the disparity while counting the votes, which could lead to inaccurate tallies.

The American Voter’s Alliance published a detailed investigative report on this issue, as did RealClear Investigations, InfluenceWatch, and Caesar Rodney Election Research Institute.

Arizona legislators are working to ban this practice in the state, and we hope that other states will follow suit.

Other Reports

  • A team of scientists from produced the report “2020 Presidential Election Contrast Analysis” which includes a section on Texas

  • Bexar County Election Integrity, a grassroots group, has information on election issues in the county and is recruiting volunteers to assist with the cause

  • Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton reported on Sep 24, 2021 that he is still prosecuting over 500 cases of election fraud in the state. 12
    (If you have further details on this statistic, please let us know in the comments below.)

Get Involved

Volunteers are needed to help verify the irregularities found. One key way this is done is through voter canvassing, with teams analyzing the county and state records and voter rolls, and others going door-to-door to identify whether the records match the actual residents living at the address.

Learn more about Canvassing Volunteer in Your State

Further Updates

Jan 2, 2022 Captain Keshel and Nick Moseder Discuss the 700K ‘Imaginary Voter Registrations’ Discovered in the First Phase of the Texas Audit
Captain Keshel’s analysis of voter registration trends has delivered highly accurate predictions in previous elections. Using the same methodology, he estimates that there were nearly 700K excess votes for Biden in Texas in the 2020 election, a number eerily close to the 685K ineligible voter registrations discovered in the TX Secretary of State’s phase one audit.
Liberty Overwatch
Jan 2, 2022 Texas Secretary of State’s Phase One Investigation of the 2020 Election Identifies Nearly 700K Ineligible Voter Registrations
An investigation found 11,737 potential non-U.S. citizens were registered to vote, 224,585 deceased voters were removed from the voter rolls after the election, 449,362 duplicate voter registrations. In total, the SOS’s phase one review found approximately 685K ineligible voter registrations, confirming Captain Seth Keshel's July analysis that estimated 675K in excess/suspicious votes for Biden in Texas.
Liberty Overwatch
Mar 16, 2021 The Sovereign Crime of Industrial Scale Vote Fraud
A team of fraud analysts met in Austin, Texas to discuss their observations on the 2020 election: “Our profilers comfortably said the 2020 election fraud was on such a scale that it was impossible for the major law enforcement agencies to not have known about it in advance. They said the data easily available showed the election fraud patterns had two very alarming characteristics: It was not the first time this was tried, and it will be performed again, at scale, in the next election.”
American Thinker

Election Audit Groups on Telegram

To join the grassroots efforts in pursuing election integrity and audits of the 2020 election in Texas, you can join the following groups on Telegram:

For other states, see our Full List of Telegram Channels. has no affiliation with nor any responsibility for these channels. Discern carefully, as some users and even admins of channels have shown obstruction to transparent audits of our elections.

State Representatives Supporting Election Integrity & Audits

Following the results of the Maricopa Arizona Forensic Audit, 188 state representatives from 39 states signed a letter asking for forensic audits in all 50 states. The signatories for Texas include:

  • Representative Bryan Slaton
  • Representative James White
  • Representative Jeff Cason
  • Representative Kyle Biederman
  • Representative Steve Toth
  • Representative Tony Tinderholt

Analyst Seth Keshel also reports that he has had meetings with several candidates for Texas Governor: Don Huffines, Col. Allen West, and Chad Prather, all of whom have showed at least some interest in fixing election problems in the state. Seth has not had the same interest from Governor Greg Abbott.

Raw Data

We aim to publish links to both the raw election data and voter registration data for Texas so that citizens and researchers can analyze this information for themselves.

Show Raw Data Links

Certified Election Results

The results are somewhat hidden and you need to click into one of the later elections, and then change the selected election in the top navigation bar. From Texas Secretary of State.

Voter Registration Rolls/Database

From Texas Secretary of State.

The New York Times 2020 Election Results Results for all states, with several maps and charts.
Data Explorer Tool Our own tool for inspecting the 2020 New York Times data, including the time-series data of how the counting progressed. Also provides download links for raw JSON or CSV data, including counts for every precinct and county.
US Election Atlas Detailed results for 2020 and previous years. Some data is freely accessible on their website, while some, such as detailed historic results in CSV format, are purchasable for a fee.
This appears to be the source commonly used by Seth Keshel for his analysis, although we have not officially confirmed this.
2020 General Election Data & Research A broad collection of national stats, vote and registration counts, time-series data, voting machine information and manuals, PDF reports, and other research collated by citizen auditors.
Election Night Time-Series Data from Edison

Provides more detail than is available from the New York Times, and includes numerous interactive charts.
Download ZIP of Raw Data
Published by Jeff O’Donnell,
Weekly HAVV SSN Reports

Social Security Administration (SSA) Weekly Data for Help America Vote Verification (HAVV) Transactions by State.
Learn more about this data
Published by Jeff O’Donnell,

If you have additional sources of election data, please let us know via Telegram, Twitter or post a comment below to assist.

Footnotes & References

  1. “ES&S Voting machine Certification failures”, published Nov 19, 2021. 

  2. EAC: “VSTL Certificates & Accreditation” 

  3. EAC, Jerome Lovato Memo: “Pro V&V EAC VSTL Accreditation”, Jan 27, 2021. 

  4. See also Colorado › Use of Non-Certified Voting Machines 

  5. Verified Voting has some useful information on their website, however we feel the need to caution visitors about the partisan ties and Democrat influence within the organization. According to The Gateway Pundit: 13

    • Barbara Simons, Board Chair of Verified Voting, was appointed by top-ranking Democrats (Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and later Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer) to the seemingly-corrupt and powerful U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

    • Mark Lindeman, Co-Director of Verified Voting, openly opposed the Maricopa Forensic Audit, yet was chosen to perform the criticized Windham NH Audit.

    • Verified Voting also appear to have hidden the fact that cybersecurity consultant and New Hampshire election auditor Harri Hursti was previously a member of the organization, with all mention of him removed from their website two days after being selected for the audit, without explanation.

    Utilize the VV website with these questionable issues in mind. 

  6. American Voters Alliance & The Amistad Project: “The Legitimacy and Effect of Private Funding in Federal and State Electoral Processes”, Dec 14, 2020. 

  7. InfluenceWatch: “Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL)”  2

  8. RealClear Investigations: “How Zuckerberg Millions Paid for Progressives to Work With 2020 Vote Officials Nationwide”, May 26, 2021. The article outlines many of the specifics about how the funds were spent. 

  9. 39 Election fraud witnesses take case to Michigan Supreme Court, one alleges outside influence by Zuckerberg funded charities”, The Sara Carter Show, Dec 3, 2020  2

  10. Caesar Rodney Election Research Institute, as reported in The Federalist: “The 2020 Election Wasn’t Stolen, It Was Bought By Mark Zuckerberg”, Oct 12, 2021.  2

  11. See also our Michigan Report for more about Zuckerberg’s interference there, including a legal case taken to the Supreme Court. 

  12. Ken Paxton interview on Bannon’s War Room: “Democrats Fighting Against Legitimate Elections”, Sep 24, 2021 

  13. The Gateway Pundit: “BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: The Windham, New Hampshire 2020 Election Audit Was Over Before It Started – Two of Three Auditors Have Conflicts with Pelosi and Schumer”, May 26, 2021. 

Visitor Comments

Do you have more information about what happened in Texas? Share in the comments below.

Show Comments