Most research into election fraud has occurred in the six battleground or swing states, until recently. We’re hoping to expand our coverage to every state in the US. The below sections outline what we know so far about Texas.

Contents

Seth Keshel’s Trend Analysis

Former US military intelligence officer and statistical analyst Seth Keshel analyzed the trends of voter registrations versus actual votes and discovered alarming anomalies in a number of counties, ones that defy trends that (in some cases) have proved reliable for over 100 years. He has published a report for every state, indicating which counties’ vote counts align with the trend in voter registrations and which have small or large divergences.

Seth Keshel County Trend Map for Texas

Chart legend: Red = Rampant Fraud, Yellow = Likely/Suspect, Green = Clean

Trump votes Biden votes Other votes
Officially reported results 5890347 (52.1%) 5259126 (46.5%) 158339 (1.4%)
Estimate of potential fraud 675000 (6.0%)
Estimate of actual result
(with fraud removed)
5890347 (55.4%) 4584126 (43.1%) 158339 (1.5%)

Seth estimates that there may be approximately 675,000 votes for Biden in excess of what Texas registration trends would indicate — a possible indicator of fraud. Counties with the greatest number of excess votes deserve closer inspection.

View Seth’s National Summary   View Seth’s Texas Report

Electronic Voting Machines

The polling place equipment used for each county in the US is listed at Verified Voting. They also have a detailed database including photographs of the various models of voting equipment. Note that the polling and ballot marking equipment is different to the scanning and tabulation equipment — both need to be highly secure, and in most cases are not.

Voting machines have introduced many vulnerabilities and avenues for manipulation in elections. Cybersecurity experts tell us that there is no such thing as a fully secure computer system, and the more complex our voting systems and election systems get, with more moving parts and connections, the more impossible it will be for any state or county to defend against a nation-state-level threat. It’s not possible. The efficiency gains brought by machines are not reason enough to tolerate the loss of security, accountability, and transparency.

Elections need to return to paper ballots and mechanical or hand counting to minimize the threat of cyber attacks and manipulation by fraud. Let your state representative, county clerk, county commissioners, and Secretary of State know your opinion about this.

Alleged Interference from Mark & Priscilla Zuckerberg

Multiple reports 1 2 3 4 5 accuse charities supported by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife of illegally influencing the 2020 presidential election in multiple states, including Texas. Through their donations of $400 million into charities like The Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), millions poured into the key swing states of Michigan 6, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, as well as Texas, North Carolina, and Virginia, in violation of federal law. 4

25 out of the 26 cities and counties that received at least $1 million from CTCL were won by Biden in 2020. 2

In Texas, donations were dispersed in a seemingly partisan way: 5

Zuckerberg spending, via CTCL, in 21 Texas counties

Having paid poll workers in one district and only minimal volunteers in Republican districts added to the disparity while counting the votes, which could lead to inaccurate tallies.

The American Voter’s Alliance published a detailed investigative report on this issue, as did RealClear Investigations, InfluenceWatch, and Caesar Rodney Election Research Institute.

Arizona legislators are working to ban this practice in the state, and we hope that other states will follow suit.

Other Reports

  • A team of scientists from Election-Integrity.info produced the report “2020 Presidential Election Contrast Analysis” which includes a section on Texas

  • Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton reported on Sep 24, 2021 that he is still prosecuting over 500 cases of election fraud in the state. 7
    (If you have further details on this statistic, please let us know in the comments below.)

Get Involved

Volunteers are needed to help verify the irregularities found. One key way this is done is through voter canvassing, with teams analyzing the county and state records and voter rolls, and others going door-to-door to identify whether the records match the actual residents living at the address.

Learn more about Canvassing Volunteer in Your State

Election Audit Groups on Telegram

To join the grassroots efforts in pursuing election integrity and audits of the 2020 election in Texas, you can join the following groups on Telegram:

For other states, see our Full List of Telegram Channels.

ElectionFraud20.org has no affiliation with nor any responsibility for these channels. Discern carefully, as some users and even admins of channels have shown obstruction to transparent audits of our elections.

State Representatives Supporting Election Integrity & Audits

Following the results of the Maricopa Arizona Forensic Audit, 112 state representatives signed a letter asking for forensic audits in all 50 states.

From Texas, only Representative Steve Toth has so far signed the document.

Analyst Seth Keshel also reports that he has had meetings with several candidates for Texas Governor: Don Huffines, Col. Allen West, and Chad Prather, all of whom have showed at least some interest in fixing election problems in the state. Seth has not had the same interest from Governor Greg Abbott.

Raw Data

  • In most states, the certified election results and voter registration statistics are available from the Secretary of State or State Board of Elections. Check their website for details.

  • The New York Times 2020 Election Site contains results for all states, with several maps and charts

  • Our own Data Explorer Tool allows you to inspect the 2020 New York Times data, including the time-series data of how the counting progressed, and can be downloaded in JSON or CSV format. It also includes counts for every precinct and county.

  • USElectionAtlas.org provides detailed results for 2020 and previous years. Some data is freely accessible on their website, while some, such as detailed historic results in CSV format, is purchasable for a fee.

  • Jeff O’Donnell has compiled additional data at MagaRaccoon.com that may be useful:

Footnotes & References

  1. American Voters Alliance & The Amistad Project: “The Legitimacy and Effect of Private Funding in Federal and State Electoral Processes”, Dec 14, 2020. 

  2. InfluenceWatch: “Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL)”  2

  3. RealClear Investigations: “How Zuckerberg Millions Paid for Progressives to Work With 2020 Vote Officials Nationwide”, May 26, 2021. The article outlines many of the specifics about how the funds were spent. 

  4. 39 Election fraud witnesses take case to Michigan Supreme Court, one alleges outside influence by Zuckerberg funded charities”, The Sara Carter Show, Dec 3, 2020  2

  5. Caesar Rodney Election Research Institute, as reported in The Federalist: “The 2020 Election Wasn’t Stolen, It Was Bought By Mark Zuckerberg”, Oct 12, 2021.  2

  6. See also our Michigan Report for more about Zuckerberg’s interference there, including a legal case taken to the Supreme Court. 

  7. Ken Paxton interview on Bannons War Room: “Democrats Fighting Against Legitimate Elections”, Sep 24, 2021 

Visitor Comments

Do you have more information about what happened in Texas? Share in the comments below.

Show Comments