|Number of disputed ballots||300,000 votes (approx.)|
|Joe Biden’s winning margin||10,457 votes (0.3%)|
|Arizona’s electoral college votes under dispute||11 votes
(36 would need to be flipped for a Trump win)
|Independent forensic audit investigation||Partial investigations performed in 2 counties, although heavily obstructed|
Unobserved ballot counting
Many nonimmigrants and non-citizens voting without verification
29,326 voter roll anomalies
Thousands of duplicated ballots lacking serial numbers
Use of unofficial ballot paper
Outstanding/unresolved integrity issues with Dominion counting machines, including the erasure of security log files
Maricopa County’s obstruction of the forensic audit and refusal to comply with state Senators’ requests
Unobserved Ballot Counting
Vote counting rooms were announced as “closed down”, and yet counting continued, without independent observers present. This occurred in Pima County, Coconino County, and Maricopa County – which combined, reach into hundreds of thousands of ballots. 1
Many Non-Citizens Voted In Election
Arizona’s Governor Doug Ducey 2 submitted an official vote count and statement that claims there were zero non-immigrant and non-citizen votes. However, based on a survey of voters by Trump legal team, a conservative estimate of 36,000 non-citizens voted in the election (or possibly as high as 237,000). 1
Arizona also reportedly had over 21,000 “federal only voters” who did not provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote. Senator Kelly Townsend alleges that “These voters cannot prove they are a citizen or that they even exist. They are not in the MVD system and all they need is a bank statement (easily doctored) to get a ballot.” 3 These alone are more than double Biden’s winning margin.
Eye-witness testimony of highly-secretive and suspicious activity at Wigwam Resort, Litchfield, Arizona in Sept 2020, two months prior to the election, that appeared to be a significant election fraud and ballot harvesting operation, with two large ballrooms full of equipment, and transporting ballots between Arizona and Georgia. The witness was former Police Detective Gerald Buglione. 4
“2000 Mules” Reveals Ballot Harvesting Operation
The May 2022 documentary 2000 Mules revealed video evidence of a coordinated, funded, illegal ballot trafficking network across critical swing states including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Texas.
The documentary explains how True the Vote were able to identify over 2,000 ballot traffickers by obtaining 2 petabytes of geofencing cellphone ping data purchased from brokers. Their threshold for identifying a mule was if they visited at least 10 drop boxes and made at least 5 visits to a non-profit organization which showed evidence of functioning as a ballot “stash house”. They then obtained 4 million minutes of drop box video surveillance footage through FOIA requests which showed the traffickers in action. 5
|Drop boxes involved:||20|
|Estimated illegal votes:||20,000|
This massive number of votes was more than enough in itself to tip Arizona’s election outcome where Biden supposedly won by 10,457 votes.
A massive, abnormal “vote dump” with an unexpected swing to Biden: 6 7
Seth Keshel’s Trend Analysis
Former US military intelligence officer and statistical analyst Seth Keshel analyzed the trends of voter registrations versus actual votes and discovered alarming anomalies in a number of counties, ones that defy typical historical trends. He has published a report for every state, indicating which counties’ vote counts align with the trend in voter registrations and which have small or large divergences.
|Trump votes||Biden votes||Other votes|
|Officially reported results||1661686 (49.1%)||1672143 (49.4%)||50774 (1.5%)|
|Estimate of potential fraud||210000 (6.2%)|
|Estimate of actual result
(with fraud removed)
|1661686 (52.3%)||1462143 (46.1%)||50774 (1.6%)|
Seth estimates that there may be approximately 210,000 votes for Biden in excess of what Arizona registration trends would indicate — a possible indicator of fraud. Counties with the greatest number of excess votes deserve closer inspection.
Seth has listed Arizona’s Maricopa and Pima counties as being among the Nation’s Top 100 Worst Counties in terms of abnormal trends during the 2020 election.
View Seth’s National Summary View Seth’s Arizona Report
Bobby Piton’s Analysis
Mathematician Bobby Piton reviewed election data and stated during the state legislature hearing that he believes the numbers in Arizona are fraudulent, saying he would “stake his life” on it based on the mathematically problematic data. Piton estimated there are between 160,000 and 400,000 phantom voters. 8 Piton’s Twitter account was suspended during his testimony. 9
Trump’s Legal Team has alleged that the number of suspicious out-of-state voters were higher than Joe Biden’s winning margin. 1
Election Integrity Scorecard
The Heritage Foundation’s Election Integrity Scorecard is an assessment of each state’s voting laws, written regulations and procedures. Arizona was ranked equal 19th out of 51.
|Arizona's Total Score||63%|
|Voter ID Implementation||45%|
|Accuracy of Voter Registration Lists||63%|
|Absentee Ballot Management||67%|
|Vote Harvesting/Trafficking Restrictions||100%|
|Access of Election Observers||100%|
|Verification of Citizenship||75%|
|Identification for Voter Assistance||33%|
|Vote Counting Practices||33%|
|Election Litigation Procedures||0%|
|Restriction of Same-day Registration||100%|
|Restriction of Automatic Registration||100%|
|Restriction of Private Funding of Election Officials or Government Agencies||100%|
View the full Scorecard for Arizona
It’s important to note that the scores above reflect the laws, regulations, and processes that exist within the state, but not whether they were actually followed. In the 2020 election, some states with highly-rated election integrity measures did not uphold them. 10 As The Heritage Foundation reminds us, even the best laws are not worth much unless responsible officials enforce them rigorously. It is up to the citizens of each state to make sure that their elected and appointed public officials do just that.
Alleged Interference from Mark & Priscilla Zuckerberg
Multiple reports 11 12 13 14 15 16 accuse charities supported by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife of illegally influencing the 2020 presidential election in multiple states, including Arizona. Through their donations of $400 million into charities like The Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), millions poured into the key swing states of Michigan 17, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, as well as Texas, North Carolina, and Virginia, in violation of federal law. 14
25 out of the 26 cities and counties that received at least $1 million from CTCL were won by Biden in 2020. 12
Here are the CTCL grants in Arizona, and who won each county: 12
Having paid poll workers in one district and only minimal volunteers in Republican districts added to the disparity while counting the votes, which could lead to inaccurate tallies.
The American Voter’s Alliance published a detailed investigative report on this issue, as did RealClear Investigations, InfluenceWatch, and Caesar Rodney Election Research Institute.
As of March 2022, twelve states have either banned or severely restricted the acceptance and use of private funds for state and local elections: AZ, AK, FL, GA, ID, IN, KS, MS, ND, OH, TN, and TX. Another 5 states have passed anti-Zuckerbucks legislation that is awaiting a Republican governor’s signature: AL, OK, SD and VA. We’re hoping that more will soon follow suit.
Bloated Voter Rolls
In Oct 2020, a month before the election, Judicial Watch released a study that found 353 US counties in 29 states had voter registration rates exceeding 100% of the eligible voting-age citizens.
In Arizona the following counties exceeded 100%: Santa Cruz County (107%); Apache County (106%).
While this could be a symptom of poor clean-up of voter rolls — where voters that have died or moved interstate are left on the rolls for extended periods of time — it creates significant opportunity for fraudulent ballots to be submitted under the names of expired voters, making them appear legitimate. This was made even easier with the prevalence of mail-in ballots and widespread abandonment of voter ID rules which occurred in many states during the 2020 election.
The door-to-door canvassing across numerous states is proving that “phantom votes” were indeed counted for certain voters who were registered but did not themselves submit a ballot.
Research is also underway to explore disconcerting cases in some states whereby voter rolls appear to have been deliberately padded with false, duplicated, or expired records, possibly for the purpose of providing cover for fraudulent ballots. This is evidenced by graphing the changes to voter rolls over time and observing patterns which appear algorithmically-generated rather than organic, and then drilling down to identify specific anomalous records. We hope to release more findings on these anomalies in the coming weeks.
Summary by The American Spectator, “Election 2020: Can Classic Fraud Evidence Save The Day?”:
“In a lawsuit filed by Arizona Elector Kelli Ward on behalf of Team Trump, the Arizona Supreme Court denied her petition. The decision rested upon a trial court finding after a small sample of ballots were audited, with presentations from each side’s expert witness, that the election had seen far too little fraud to alter the outcome. Arizona’s election law requires that the margin be within 0.01 percent — in Arizona’s 2020 election, 3,339 votes — for an automatic recount. Further, unlike in Wisconsin, the Arizona Election Commission’s administrative guidelines, per legislative delegation, have the force of law. Given the extremely stringent threshold for contesting the election, the Court’s ruling appears reasonable.”
As of October 2021, the district, state and supreme courts have ruled on several election fraud issues, while numerous other cases are still open. Some cases were dismissed on legal technicalities, preventing evidence from being presented and considered; but a detailed list of cases and outcomes available here show that at a national level, Trump/Republicans have so far prevailed in 18 out of 25 cases that were decided on the merits of the evidence.
Maricopa County Election Audits
1. Maricopa County Internal Audit
On Jan 28, 2021, Maricopa County officials voted unanimously to approve their own “forensic audit” by hiring two supposedly-independent companies to conduct a review into whether voting machines counted votes correctly, and whether they were tampered with or hacked in any way.
The Maricopa Board of Supervisors demanded that the auditor be an EAC-accredited Voting System Test Laboratory (VSTL), of which there were only two: Pro V&V and SLI Compliance. Although the Senate disagreed, the Maricopa BoS went ahead anyway and unilaterally contracted both firms to audit the Dominion voting systems and equipment (while ignoring other important aspects of the election). 18
The major concern with this was that Dominion had previously contracted these two companies to certify their machines, and as such they would be inherently biased against finding issues in the same machines they, themselves, were paid to certify. There were also reports that neither of the two firms above were actually certified at the time Maricopa County claimed they were. When this was reported by The Gateway Pundit, within four hours the EAC issued their certifications. 18
Arizona state Senator Warren Peterson also believed that it lacked the depth and breadth required, stating that “A county audit will not prevent the Senate from doing their own audit. My concern with the county audit is that the scope of the audit is an inch deep. With the limited scope they have asked to be audited, they are guaranteed to find nothing.” 19
2. Senate Forensic Audit of Maricopa County
For a more detailed overview, see Maricopa Forensic Audit.
The state Senate issued several subpoenas (legally binding requests) to the Maricopa Country election board and county recorder, to access its voting machines, copies of all ballots and much more so it can perform its own audit. The election board repeatedly resisted and refused a number of the requests, saying they were overly broad, and aimed to negotiate a settlement with the Senate. 19 The Senate eventually received the ballots and some of the other requested materials, and began the audit.
Several preliminary issues were raised during the audit process:
Ongoing refusal to comply with the Senate’s subpoenas 20
Chain of custody and ballot organization anomalies 20
Deleted vote-counting databases 20
73,243 mail-in ballots have no record of being sent out 21
(Maricopa County later responded, arguing that this number also includes early in-person votes which would not have been mailed)
11,326 voters were not listed on November 3 voter roll, but were listed on December 4 voter roll and were listed as having voted in the election 21
18,000 who voted in November but were then removed from the rolls 21 22
Thousands of duplicated ballots that lacked serial numbers. Senate President Karen Fann noted that without serial numbers, it would be impossible to know how many times a ballot was duplicated. 21
168,000 ballots are printed on unofficial paper that the county claims they did not use. This could be a simple mistake, or an indication of fraudulent ballots. 21
An unpublicized digital breach of the election system in November 21 22
A one-off digital event erasing the security log for the period covering the November election. The auditors reported 37,646 entries into the digital security log for the election management system – which has only eight accounts – on one day, 11 March 2021. Data being kept on a first-in, first-out principle, the digital deluge shoved enough previous data out to hide election security log events before February 2021. Rep. Finchem claims this shows criminal intent. 21 22
The full Senate hearing from July 16 was available on YouTube Censored, or on Rumble, here.
Maricopa County officials have been highly oppositional to the audit at every stage, and deny each of the issues. They have responded to common questions and allegations on their website.
After the county continued to refuse the Senate’s subpoenas, the matter has been referred to the State Attorney General for investigation.
Telling the Story
On Aug 12, at the Cyber Symposium, Arizona State Representatives Mark Finchem, Sonny Borrelli, and Wendy Rogers told the story of the entire audit process, including responding to early election fraud reports and moving through with the forensic audit despite many obstructions from Maricopa County, the media and others.
In the video, they respond to the common attack against the audit: that “Cyber Ninjas are not an accredited audit company”, reporting that there is no such thing as accredited election auditors in America, only accredited voting system test laboratories (VSTL). These labs are hired by voting machine companies like Dominion to grant them government EAC certification, and as such would be inherently biased against finding issues in machines that they themselves were paid to certify. When the Senators then approached big financial auditing companies, they all refused, saying it would put their government contracts at risk. The media has often ignored these crucial points.
See also: Common Criticisms of the Audit
Senate President Karen Fann also tells the story from her perspective in a 3-part video series on Twitter. See Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.
Forensic Audit Results
On Sep 24, 2021, the Arizona Senate heard presentations from the key auditors, presenting their findings.
The audit report identifies more than 57K questionable votes, intentionally deleted election files, and other suspicious voting machine activity. 23
The official written reports can be obtained from The Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus, or we’ve included direct links below.
|Cyber Ninjas Report
(recount and ballot audits)
|Report Volume 1|
|Report Volume 2|
|Report Volume 3|
(voting machines & cyber security)
|Presentation from Ben Cotton, CyFIR Founder|
|Report by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai|
|Randy Pullen’s Report||Presentation|
|Ken Bennett’s Report (election procedures)||Presentation|
|Senate President Karen Fann||Letter to Attorney General Mark Brnovich|
We recommend checking The Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus website for the latest versions, in case they release further reports or updates that we have not listed here.
Major issues identified:
255,326 early votes are recorded in the VM55 file of counted ballots but are missing from the EV33 file 24
17,322 duplicate votes (where voters sent in 2 or more ballots) that were illegally counted in the final certified tally (a large surge of these were dated the week following the election) 25
27,807 ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election, and are unlikely to have physically received their ballots legally
Envelopes without signatures that were stamped as “approved”
Ballot envelopes showing an apparent “approved” stamp behind the basic graphics of the envelope, suggesting tampering, or at the very least, poor quality scanning and archival of envelope images
The systems related to elections integrity had numbers that could not balance or agree with each other
The voter rolls and the registration management process itself having many data integrity issues. For instance, over 200 individuals were easily identifiable as likely being the same person but having two different Voter IDs and voting twice in the election.
Without access to the County’s detailed records including personally identifiable information and registration systems it is more likely there were many tens of thousands of improper votes in the election from double voters, deceased voters, voters for which there is no trace in the public records nor association to their voting address
Proper voter registration law and procedures were not followed
There were unexplained large purges of registered voters, right after the election, of people who had voted in the election
There was back-dating of registrations, adjustments made to historical voting and voter records, unexplained linking of voter registration affidavits to multiple voters and more
Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server and other voting machines, either intentionally or negligently removed
Ballot images on the EMS were corrupt or missing
Logs appeared to have been intentionally overwritten
All data in one database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully wiped. This occurred on the day prior to Maricopa’s own internal audit. 26
On the ballot side, batches were not always clearly delineated, duplicated ballots were missing the required serial numbers, some originals were duplicated more than once, and the auditors were never provided chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots for the time-period prior to the ballot’s movement into the auditors’ care. This all increased the complexity and difficulty in properly auditing the results.
There were significant anomalies identified in the ratio of hand-folded ballots, on-demand printed ballots, and a significant increase in provisional ballot rejections for a mail-in ballot already being cast, suggestive of mail-in ballots being cast for voters without their knowledge.
Maricopa County failed to follow basic cyber security best practices and guidelines from CISA 27
Remote Access and “Terminal Services” features of Windows were enabled allowing machines to be remotely controlled 27
Software and patch protocols were not followed 27
Credential management was flawed: unique usernames and passwords were not allocated. Many (if not all) accounts shared the same password, and multiple users appear to have shared the same account. 27
A dual-boot configuration was discovered on adjudication equipment which is not an approved configuration. The second hard drive contained non-Maricopa County data.
Here is a summary table from the Cyber Ninjas report (Volume III). This does not include the 17,322 duplicate ballots found by Dr. Shiva (EchoMail) and the 255,326 early votes that appear in the VM55 but are missing from EV33 file.
A lot of the mainstream media has picked up on a single results table from Doug Logan that showed that the audit team’s count of the ballots closely matched the certified results, using that as supposed proof that Biden still won the state. What is being overlooked is the highly questionable validity of those votes.
Also note that this is not the complete audit report. Analysis of the routers, Splunk logs, and paper ballots is still ongoing.
Thanks to @LibertyOverwatchChannel for sifting through the reports and providing summaries. A further summary, with slightly more detail is on Patrick Byrne’s website.
Below, you can watch the full 3-hour hearing:
Several workers from the forensic audit — Maricopa residents who voted in the election and passed background checks — were interviewed on what they witnessed during the audit. They reported seeing numerous anomalies including ballots that were filled in “too perfectly”, indicating possible duplication by machine; and abnormal repeating patterns such as 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump. Despite being reported, these issues may not have made it into the final report. See their testimony in the video below:
Editor’s note: Regarding the machine-printed ballots mentioned in the video above, Doug Logan, the lead auditor from Cyber Ninjas reported that there are some legitimate scenarios where ballots are marked by a machine, such as if they are damaged, or unable to be scanned 28, or from ballot marking devices (BMDs) used by voters who are unable or uncomfortable marking a ballot by hand. While BMDs may be needed for voters with disabilities, they have known issues when used in large populations.
Analysis of the routers, Splunk logs, and paper ballots is still ongoing. We’ll update this page as more findings are uncovered.
Maricopa County officials took to Twitter and sympathetic media channels to deny the allegations and minimize the report’s findings. They claimed the results were mistaken and that they had provided everything in the Senate’s subpoena, despite several key items still being withheld.
Members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, as well as Ken Bennett, Senate liason for the audit, presented testimony to Federal Congress’ Oversight Committee on the findings, during which the county admitted to removing election files from machines prior to the audit. 29
Dr. Shiva, who ran the audit of ballot envelopes, held a follow-up open discussion forum on the Maricopa Audit, open to Republicans, Democrats and state/county officials. See the full video and our summary here.
Cyber Ninjas later provided a great, detailed rebuttal to Maricopa County on their denials and deflections. It addresses specific claims, one-by-one, with screenshot evidence and links to further references.
So What Happens Now?
Senator Karen Fann has forwarded all reports onto Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who is in the process of identifying criminal activity and other breaches of law that need to be prosecuted.
The state congress will also likely explore further actions such as potentially decertifying the results. We expect to hear more about this in the coming days and weeks. 30
Forensic Ballot Analysis by Erich Speckin
As part of the Maricopa Forensic Audit covering the 2020 election, forensic document analyst and ink dating specialist Erich Speckin was brought in to review the authenticity of the paper ballots via scans and microscopic photographs.
In summary, he found that:
23,000 ballots were printed from an unidentified printing source other than directly from the official election ballot PDF
58 batches of ballots (totalling 11,600) favored Biden by 90% or more. Only three batches (totalling 600) favored Trump by 90% or more. This outcome is very statistically unlikely in such a closely contested election. These all came from the “early voting” ballots. If these batches are excluded, Biden would not have won the election in Arizona.
In the following video he explains his findings:
Read More About the Speckin Report
Maricopa County Canvassing Results
The original scope of the Maricopa Forensic Audit included voter canvassing — directly interviewing voters and visiting registered addresses to confirm that official records match how residents actually voted. The Federal Department of Justice swiftly enacted significant pressure against this canvassing, saying that it equated to “voter intimidation”, and would be potentially illegal. This blockade of the Senate’s efforts forced them to focus on the remaining aspects of the audit.
But hundreds of private citizens such as those led by Liz Harris had already begun their own grass-roots canvassing effort, visiting 11,708 residential properties and gathering data on 4,570 voters. On Sep 8, 2021, Harris shared her report revealing that:
Out of 964 residents interviewed who were on record as having not voted — over 34% of them said they actually did vote. 1 in 3 of these voters had their votes “lost”. If this rate is applied to the entire county, this would account for 165,518–180,690 lost votes. A similar survey in Nov 2020 found an even higher rate of 50.1% of mail-in ballots not being recorded. 31
5.66% of the interviews identified “phantom” voters who did not reside at their specified address, yet submitted mail-in ballots. This could affect an estimated 96,389 mail-in ballots out of the 1.7 million total. They discovered repeated instances over 8+ years whereby this occurred.
In some cases the ballot was crossed out and returned to the county, at other times the ballot was retained by the real resident; yet in both of these types of cases, ballots were somehow recorded as “returned”, and a vote was counted.
Smaller scale issues such as votes cast by mail from vacant lots
The team is also surveying all Arizona residents via a form at canvass50.com, asking as many residents as possible to identify which method they used to vote during the 2020 election, so that any issues with the county records can be identified.
Similar grassroots canvass efforts are underway in at least eleven states. Learn more about the thousands of irregularities being uncovered in our article on Door-to-Door Canvassing Results.
On Dec 13, 2021, Pima County also came under the spotlight with a 7-hour election integrity hearing. The full video can be seen below:
We hope to provide a summary of the findings in the coming days.
Volunteers are needed to help verify the irregularities found. One key way this is done is through voter canvassing, with teams analyzing the county and state records and voter rolls, and others going door-to-door to identify whether the records match the actual residents living at the address.
Learn more about Canvassing Volunteer in Your State
You can also contact your state representatives and ask them to thoroughly investigate all credible allegations and ensure forensic audits are pursued to completion, across all necessary counties.
|Mar 21, 2022||
On March 9th, the Arizona Attorney General’s office sent the Maricopa County Recorder’s office and the Board of Supervisors (BOS) a “Third Request For Records Or Information on Voter Registration Records, Ballot Affidavit Signature Batching, & Renewed Request.” This third round added a demand for signature records based on Dr. Shiva’s two signature verification reviews.Liberty Overwatch
|Feb 24, 2022||
Irreconcilable Differences: Study Determines Maricopa County Counted More Than 200K Mail-In Ballots with Mismatched Signatures
Dr. Shiva completed a pilot signature verification study of the early voting mail-in ballot (EVB) signatures in Maricopa County, AZ. From this analysis, he determined that at least 12% of the 1,911,902 EVBs in Maricopa County had signature mismatches, representing 229,433 ballots that should have been “cured.”Liberty Overwatch
|Feb 7, 2022||
State Representative Mark Finchem has introduced HCR 2033, a concurrent resolution calling for the elections of Maricopa, Pima and Yuma Counties to be set aside based on clear and convincing evidence that the elections in those counties were irredeemably compromised.Representative Mark Finchem
|Feb 3, 2022|
Election Audit Groups on Telegram
To join the grassroots efforts in pursuing election integrity and audits of the 2020 election in Arizona, you can join the following groups on Telegram:
- Arizona Audit Force
- Arizona Red Roots
- Representative Mark Finchem
- Senator Kelly Townsend
- Senator Wendy Rogers
For other states, see our Full List of Telegram Channels.
ElectionFraud20.org has no affiliation with nor any responsibility for these channels. Discern carefully, as some users and even admins of channels have shown obstruction to transparent audits of our elections.
State Representatives Supporting Election Integrity & Audits
Following the results of the Maricopa Arizona Forensic Audit, 188 state representatives from 39 states signed a letter asking for forensic audits in all 50 states. The signatories for Arizona include:
- Representative Beverly Pingerelli
- Representative Brenda Barton
- Representative Jacqueline Parker
- Representative Jake Hoffman
- Representative John Fillmore
- Representative Joseph Chaplik
- Representative Judy Burges
- Representative Kevin Payne
- Representative Leo Biasiucci
- Representative Mark Finchem
- Senator Kelly Townsend
- Senator Sonny Borrelli
- Senator Wendy Rogers
Arizona Congresswoman Debbie Lesko is part of the US Congress Election Integrity Caucus, a group of 55 federal members working together on issues of election integrity to ensure that Americans in every state and territory have confidence in free, fair, accurate, and transparent elections.
We aim to publish links to both the raw election data and voter registration data for Arizona so that citizens and researchers can analyze this information for themselves.
|Voter Registration Rolls/Database||
In some states, these are freely available from the Secretary of State or State Board of Elections. Check their website. In other states, voter rolls must be purchased and/or accessed via a signed legal agreement. Some officials are also obstructing access to the rolls, to make auditing difficult. Let us know via Telegram or via the comment section below if you experience issues.
|Cast Vote Records||Ordros Analytics has collated a repository of Cast Vote Records (CVRs) which list everyone who voted in the Nov 2020 election. Only some counties in some states are represented, but the list is growing.|
|The New York Times 2020 Election Results||Results for all states, with several maps and charts.|
|Data Explorer Tool||Our own tool for inspecting the 2020 New York Times data, including the time-series data of how the counting progressed. Also provides download links for raw JSON or CSV data, including counts for every precinct and county.|
|US Election Atlas||
Detailed results for 2020 and previous years. Some data is freely accessible on their website, while some, such as detailed historic results in CSV format, are purchasable for a fee.
This appears to be the source commonly used by Seth Keshel for his analysis, although we have not officially confirmed this.
|2020 General Election Data & Research||A broad collection of national stats, vote and registration counts, time-series data, voting machine information and manuals, PDF reports, and other research collated by citizen auditors.|
|Election Night Time-Series Data from Edison||
Provides more detail than is available from the New York Times, and includes numerous interactive charts.
Download ZIP of Raw Data
Published by Jeff O’Donnell, MagaRaccoon.com
|Weekly HAVV SSN Reports||
Social Security Administration (SSA) Weekly Data for Help America Vote Verification (HAVV) Transactions by State.
Learn more about this data
Published by Jeff O’Donnell, MagaRaccoon.com
If you have additional sources of election data, please let us know via Telegram, Twitter or post a comment below to assist.
The following list of election allegations and links was collated by HereIsTheEvidence.com with public contributions. Some items have not been reviewed for accuracy, but we provide them below in case they contain important information that we have not covered elsewhere. Remember to use your own discernment.
Beyond Arizona, additional links of nationwide relevance are available on our Further Leads page.
Footnotes & References
Censored “The Current State Of Our Country”, Rudy Giuliani, Trump Legal Team, https://youtu.be/NAzCECx8XeE?t=990 (around 16m 30s mark). Unfortunately, this video has been censored by YouTube, and no longer appears to be accessible via this link. We will update the address once we have a new link. ↩ ↩2 ↩3
Governor Doug Ducey not only certified the tainted results (as a win for Joe Biden), but appears to have repeatedly opposed election integrity investigations and reforms. Donald Trump issued at least two public statements, criticizing Ducey’s unwillingness to fix election integrity. Ducey has also stated that it’s legally impossible for Arizona to decertify the 2020 election, but this has been disputed by others including attorney Matt DePerno. ↩
Arizona is one of just two states in the United States that requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote. The loophole, the Federal Only ballot (see explanation), which voters may use instead, does not require this documentation. Instead, voters are limited to federal races.
The exploitation of this loophole of “Federal Only” voters was flagged by Senator Kelly Townsend on Telegram (view post) and also in an article by The Gateway Pundit, Jun 6, 2021.
Arizona’s Secretary of State website outlines the official requirements for voter registration, proof of citizenship, and how “federal only” votes supposedly work. ↩
CDC Media: “Evidence To Soon Be Presented To Citizens Grand Jury Of Interstate Conspiracy To Manufacture/Harvest Counterfeit Ballots For Use In 2020 Election”, July 21, 2021. ↩
Nick Moseder: “Is ‘2000 Mules’ An Absolute Game Changer?”, May 3, 2022 ↩
Report: “2020 Presidential Election Startling Vote Spikes: Statistical Analysis of State Vote Dumps in the 2020 Presidential Election” by Eric Quinnell (Engineer); Stan Young (Statistician); Tony Cox (Statistician); Tom Davis (IT Expert); Ray Blehar (Government Analyst, ret’d); John Droz (Physicist); and Anonymous Expert. ↩
Patrick Byrne, traditionally a Libertarian, developed a team of computer specialists to investigate election integrity issues including the notorious one-sided “spikes” found in several states and has written extensively about them on his website DeepCapture.com. See “Evidence Grows: ’20 Election Was Rigged” (Nov 24, 2020) and his book “The Deep Rig”. ↩ ↩2
“UPDATE: Arizona Citizens Investigation Discovers Thousands of Phantom Voters in State – Up to 30% of Addresses in Investigation Were Fraudulent”, DJHJ Media, Jan 1, 2021. ↩
“Arizona Election Fraud Investigation Continues Despite Governor’s Certification”, Uncover DC, Dec 2, 2020. ↩
Looking at the nationwide trends over the 2020 election, it became commonplace to stretch or completely ignore the laws for absentee/mail-in ballot eligibility, bulk ballot collection, independent observation, voter ID, signature verification, citizenship verification, removal of inactive/ineligible voters from rolls, voting machine accreditation, retention of election records, transparency of operations, and numerous other laws. Most breaches have not yet been prosecuted. ↩
American Voters Alliance & The Amistad Project: “The Legitimacy and Effect of Private Funding in Federal and State Electoral Processes”, Dec 14, 2020. ↩
InfluenceWatch: “Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL)” ↩ ↩2 ↩3
RealClear Investigations: “How Zuckerberg Millions Paid for Progressives to Work With 2020 Vote Officials Nationwide”, May 26, 2021. The article outlines many of the specifics about how the funds were spent. ↩
“39 Election fraud witnesses take case to Michigan Supreme Court, one alleges outside influence by Zuckerberg funded charities”, The Sara Carter Show, Dec 3, 2020 ↩ ↩2
Caesar Rodney Election Research Institute, as reported in The Federalist: “The 2020 Election Wasn’t Stolen, It Was Bought By Mark Zuckerberg”, Oct 12, 2021. ↩
US Representative Claudia Tenney: “New Information Confirms Zuckerberg-Connected Group Funneled Majority of Election Payments to Democrat-Leaning Counties”, Dec 20, 2021 ↩
See also our Michigan Report for more about Zuckerberg’s interference there, including a legal case taken to the Supreme Court. ↩
The Gateway Pundit: “Both “Accredited” Voting System Test Laboratories Hired by Maricopa County Forgot To Audit Something In Their Audits, July 4, 2021. ↩ ↩2
“Maricopa County votes to audit machines used in November election”, Fox 10 Phoenix, Jan 27, 2021. ↩ ↩2
From the full letter from Arizona Senate to Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, May 12, 2021. View PDF. ↩ ↩2 ↩3
From Arizona Audit Senate Hearing, July 16, 2021. A short summary of the 2 hour hearing is available from OAN via this link. The full hearing was available on YouTube Censored or on Rumble, here. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7
The Spectator Australia: “The Big Lie vs Stop the Steal”, July 24, 2021. ↩ ↩2 ↩3
Correction: We previously quoted the report as saying Cyber Ninjas writes, “based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable.” Apparently this conclusion that “the election should not be certified” was included in an early, leaked draft report, but Doug Logan, author of the report states that this was added to the draft by a junior audit staff member and was removed from the final report. 28 32 Doug made every attempt to present the findings factually and neutrally. We have since removed that statement. ↩
UncoverDC explains these files and what they were expected to contain. See “Cyber Ninjas Report: 255,326 Ballots Cast, No Record Of Receipt”, Sep 28, 2021. ↩
According to Dr. Shiva, there was a massive surge of duplicate ballots AFTER the polls closed on election day. Between November 4th and November 9th, 25% of all double votes were received by election officials, eventually getting counted in the final total. Curious timing? Did they wait to see how many extra votes they needed? See the relevant snippet of the presentation via this Tweet.
Dr. Shiva and his research team were able to track the timing of the duplicate ballots by looking at the timestamps of all Early Voting Ballots that were received by election officials.
Dr. Shiva also held a follow-up open forum on the Maricopa Audit. See the full video and our summary here. ↩
Maricopa County claims that they “archived” a lot of data prior to the audit, and are still in possession of this data, but since it was not listed in the subpoena, they were not required to provide it to auditors. It has not yet been confirmed whether this data actually exists as they claim. ↩
Maricopa County claim that these security practices are unnecessary because the vote tabulation network is “airgapped” (meaning it’s on its own isolated network, unconnected to the internet), however they appear to be naively unaware (or criminally complicit) as to the numerous ways that attackers can infiltrate an airgapped network. Evidence in the report also demonstrates that there were periods of internet connectivity, contradicting their claims. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
Conservative Podcast: Interview with Doug Logan, Cyber Ninjas CEO, Oct 7, 2021. It’s a long video, and we’ve misplaced the timestamp, but it’s probably within the 10min - 1hr segment. ↩ ↩2
C-Span User Clip: “Maricopa County Admits They Deleted Files That Were Archived, Not Given in Subpoena”, Oct 7, 2021. Or see the full 3hr 45min hearing video, on C-Span. ↩
Whether the state legislature can actually “decertify” the previous election is hotly debated. Arizona Governor Doug Ducey has stated it’s not legally possible to do so, and he won’t pursue it (although he has been highly resistant to the entire audit process, and potentially complicit). Attorney Matt DePerno has written to Senator Wendy Rogers and also stated in interviews that the Constitution does give this power to the state. They just need the courage to exert the power given to them. ↩
Interestingly, Maricopa County stated in their 2020 Voter Education report that 2,160,412 residents requested an early ballot, but only 1,915,487 of them returned their ballot. This equates to 244,925 voters who were recorded as not returning the ballot that they, themselves requested. Is it logical to expect that 11.3% of engaged voters who requested a ballot decided not to return it?
Censored For an overview of the Maricopa Voter Education report, see Dr. Shiva Live: Maricopa Audit Open Forum for Public, Press & Maricopa Election Officials, from 21min 40sec mark. ↩
According to interview with Doug Logan at The Gateway Pundit: “Exclusive Interview with Doug Logan from Cyber Ninjas on the Arizona Senate Forensic Audit – Updated”, Sep 28, 2021 ↩
Do you have more information about what happened in Arizona? Share in the comments below.