See also the main article on Oklahoma, for documented election integrity issues and further reports.

Former US military intelligence officer and statistical analyst Seth Keshel analyzed the trends of voter registrations versus actual votes. The following report indicates which counties’ vote counts align with the trend in voter registrations and which have small or large divergences. Each county is flagged as red, yellow, or green, based on whether the 2020 vote totals aligned with the expected trends (as past decades demonstrate they typically do), or if they diverged in statistically unlikely ways.

Seth Keshel County Trend Map for Oklahoma

Chart legend: Red = Rampant Fraud, Yellow = Likely/Suspect, Green = Clean

Seth Keshel County Trends for Oklahoma

Trump votes Biden votes Other votes
Officially reported results 1020280 (65.4%) 503890 (32.3%) 35881 (2.3%)
Estimate of potential fraud 39000 (2.5%)
Estimate of actual result
(with fraud removed)
1020280 (67.1%) 464890 (30.6%) 35881 (2.4%)

Something seems off when Trump gains 71k new votes in Oklahoma, and Biden cranks out 84k, especially when every single county trends more Republican in registration, with that indicator forecasting wider margins each election since 2008.

Biden is at least 39k heavy per trend/population/registration analysis. Oklahoma County (OKC) is the big issue and had a contested house race. Republicans outregistered Democrats 5 to 3 after Trump won it by 10.5% in 2016, but Trump somehow barely held the county. The numbers suggest electronic fraud, since the Democrat gain of 30k is an all-time high.

Tulsa is also ugly, Democrats down over 300 net on the rolls, Republicans up over 5k new registrants, Democrats gain record 21k. Cleveland County, Democrat net loss in registrations, Republicans +5.6k, record gain of 10k (7k previous).

Biden appears to be 39k heavy in Oklahoma.

If 39k heavy, Trump would be 67.0% to 30.6%, or 555k.

Most in need of audits – Oklahoma, Tulsa, Cleveland

Source: https://t.me/RealSKeshel/709


Methodology

Seth Keshel’s estimates are based on the percentage of voters who are registered to each party (where it’s possible to obtain this information) compared to the actual votes for each party. He examined these party trends over the last two decades, as well as population growth, which brought to light the strange and statistically unlikely outliers and anomalies that occurred in 2020. We explain this process, step by step, with visual examples, in our guide How to Predict Election Results Using Registration Data, so that you can investigate the numbers for yourself.

Raw Data

We aim to publish links to both the raw election data and voter registration data for Oklahoma so that citizens and researchers can analyze this information for themselves.

Show Raw Data Links

Get Involved

Volunteers are needed to help verify the irregularities found. One key way this is done is through voter canvassing, with teams analyzing the county and state records and voter rolls, and others going door-to-door to identify whether the records match the actual residents living at the address.

Learn more about Canvassing Volunteer in Your State

Election Audit Groups on Telegram

To join the grassroots efforts in pursuing election integrity and audits of the 2020 election in Oklahoma, you can join the following groups on Telegram:

For other states, see our Full List of Telegram Channels.

ElectionFraud20.org and Seth Keshel have no affiliation with nor any responsibility for these channels. Discern carefully, as some users and even admins of channels have shown obstruction to transparent audits of our elections.

Visitor Comments

Show Comments